Testing the BioElectric Shield

EMF Protection Research Studies, Articles, and Videos
on the BioElectric Shield

Since 1990 to the present, a wide range of studies have proven the Shield’s strengthening effects on the human energy system. Research documents greater resistance to any stress-producing stimuli, including computer and cell phones, stressful people or situations. Enhanced peak performance and health are shown by increased strength and healthy acupuncture scores. All research was performed with our basic shield, the sterling silver with brass tabs design. You may have seen a report on the Internet entitled “Testing the BioElectric Shield” authored by Nicholas Rose and Susan Blackmore, PhD. They concluded the Shield worked, but only because it was a placebo effect. Due to induction, both the placebo and authentic Shields helped the test subjects.

Research and Testing

Effects of The BioElectric Shield on Human Energy Systems as Measured by Computerized Acupuncture-Pilot Study

(October, 1992) View Abstract | View Study Data

Dr. Charles W. Brown tested 6 six subjects in a pilot study. Fifty (50) different acupuncture points were measured using the Interro, a Computerized Acupuncture diagnostic device.

Effects of The BioElectric Shield versus Placebo Shields in Double-Blind Studies

(December 1993) View Original Study with Data

Dr. Charles W. Brown tested 25 patients under 3 conditions:

Using applied Kinesiology, they found a muscle that would test weak on a particular subject.
The subjects were tested holding shield A (either a placebo or an authentic Shield). Strength or weakness was noted.
The subjects were tested holding shield B (either a placebo or an authentic Shield). Strength or weakness was noted.

EMF Protection BioElectric Shield verses Placebo Shield-Replication of Original Double-blind study

(1994) (Replication of Study 2 done by Dr. Charles W. Brown) Original Study with Data

In a replication of the above study, Dr. Yvonne YuRichko, DC, DABCN, tested 25 patients under the same conditions. The authentic Shield strengthened all 25 patients and the placebo shield strengthened no one. Dr. YuRichko is a Board Certified Chiropractic Neurologist, Diplomate: American Academy of Pain Management.

QXCI Analysis of BioElectric Shield and Electromagnetic Radiation

We did not ask for this testing to be done, but a customer called us and reported the results of her chiropractor using the QXCI machine to test the effectiveness of the Shield when a person is exposed to electromagnetic radiation.

Effects of The BioElectric Shield on Human EMG Response – Pilot Study

(September, 1996) View Research Study

Pilot study conducted by Charles W. Brown, D.C., D.A.B.C.N. to record human EMG response when exposed to the electromagnetic field generated by a computer. Results suggest a general weakening of muscle strength during exposure. The Bioelectric Shield mediated the stress generated by enhancing muscle strength bringing it back to, or higher than baseline, pre-exposure EMG strength levels.

Effect of The BioElectric Shield on Cardiac Response to Mobile Phone

(June 2002) Alternative Medicine Article with Research Data

Michael Borkin, N.D. of Santa Monica, Californian uses HRV (Heart Rate Variable) to assess the condition of his patients. In this informal study, heart rate was found to increase when subjects used a cell phone. Heart rate was stabilized when the subject put on a BioElectric Shield.

Effects of The BioElectric Shield on Muscle Weakness- Attributed to EMF Exposure – Original Study

(January 1994) View Original Study with Data

There are many sources of electromagnetic radiation (ELF): battery-operated devices, cell phone, TV remote, blow dryers, computers. These three devices all radiate 60-hertz frequency waves. Twenty-five (25) patients were tested under 3 conditions.

Effects of The BioElectric Shield on Muscle Weakness Attributed – Replicated Study

(June 1994) Original Study with Data

In a replication of Study 3, Dr. Yvonne YuRichko tested 25 patients under the same conditions. Results: In the two groups, 25 out of 25 people showed a drop in muscle strength. All 25 regained their original level of muscle strength after placing a Shield on their chest for only one minute.

Effects of The BioElectric Shield on Stress Tolerance Patterns

(October 1999) View Original Study

Fifty (50) individuals were tested by an Occupational Therapist using a dynamometer, a device used in clinics to test finger or grip strength. Each subject’s opponens muscle was tested with a dynamometer to determine relative strength or weakness during 3 conditions.

Effects of The BioElectric Shield on Strength Using a Dynamometer Parameter

(October 1999) View Original Study with Data

Virginia Brown, an Occupational Therapist, was testing the claim from many customers that they felt physically stronger when wearing the Shield. Two measurements were taken to test this hypothesis. Initial baseline readings were taken. The subject then wore a Shield over their lower sternal region for one minute.

Effects of The BioElectric Shield on Human EMG Response

(September, 1996) View American Journal of ElectroMedicine Article

Dr. Brown tested 25 subjects using a device called the Compufet, which produces a computerized reading of muscle activity and strength. It is accurate to .2 of a pound, and used in hospitals and clinics worldwide.

Effects of The BioElectric Shield on Human Audio Resonance Patterns

(September 1994) View Original Report

A pioneer in sound healing, Sharry Edwards, PhD., offered to test 3 of her patients without a shield, and then after wearing a shield for only 5 minutes. All three of their voice patterns went into “perfect resonance” after only 5 minutes. In this line of healing, perfect resonance is an indication of health in the body. Dr. Edwards stated this was “unheard of, and most impressive, demonstrating the balancing and strengthening effect the Shield has on the human body”.

Monroe Harmonic Translation System Report

(1994) View Full Report with Data

Without knowledge of the company, a holistic practitioner performed an analysis of the performance of both the BioElectric Shield and the Teslar watch on a patient who showed an abnormally high reading of 132 (anything over 100 is considered a problem) on his electromagnetic pollution reading. The device is similar to the older Voll Dermatron system, and is considered more accurate. It will measure many types of toxicity, including electromagnetic toxicity. When the clinician placed the BioElectric Shield on the client, the EM pollution scores dropped to 75, well within the healthy range.

The Use of Gauss Meters when Evaluating EMF Protection Devices

The issues with using Gauss Meters to evaluate the effectiveness of an EMF Protection Device. Based on an interview with an electrical engineer.

Doctor Evaluates EMF Protection Devices

Dr. David Getoff reports patient experiences wearing the BioElectric Shield as compared to other EMF devices he has tested over the past 10 years. Dr. Getoff tests all his energy-sensitive patients with the BioElectric Shield and many other energy protection devices. In 16 years of testing he has tested thousands of people. In this testing 90% tested strong with at least one product, and 98% of the time it’s the BioElectric Shield. Proving over and over again that the Shield works far better than many other products on the market. Find out more about his experiences and testing.